Showing posts with label How to innovate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label How to innovate. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Why Naïve leaders Learn to Screw Things Up

 

 Photo courtesy of Hugh Macleod

In times of uncertainty there is something to be said for “wild eyed curiosity.” That first day on the job amazement where one starts over bent on raising hell to shake things up for the better. The leader, front-line supervisor and newbie worker at least temporarily are forgiven for screwing things up. 

Curiosity for a leader or individual is motivated by a “cheeky rebelliousness” against “My way or the highway.”  They respond instinctively to processes and meetings with disdain asking the most basic of questions,” Why are we doing this?” 

Yet, what generally occurs to the newly motivated leader and employee bent on making a difference? The leader becomes captured by the process listening instead to everyone except those closest to the customers. The employee as sincere as any manager is berated with, “If we paid you to think you wouldn’t be here.” 

The leader and manager along with every small business owner anywhere defy their industry in responding to uncertainty with reinvention. To innovate. Reimagine always and forever. They learn simply to shed old ways for new ways. Jim 

How are you responding to a competitive and economic environment unlike anything that has come before? 

Jim Woods is about helping companies and people engage innovate and grow in all the areas important to them. Jim is a professional speaker, author, coach, and strategy consultant based in Colorado Springs, Co. Follow Jim on Twitter @innothinkgroup , Facebook https://www.facebook.com/InnoThink Group or check out his company website http://innothinkgroup.com for more tips and strategies effective leadership, engaged employees, increase growth, and customer effectiveness through innovation. To arrange for Jim to consult or speak at your event email Jim.

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The CEO's Frugal Innovation Agenda - Navi Radjou, Jaideep Prabhu, Simone Ahuja

CEOs of large companies face a conundrum: they are confronted with a growing number of frugal consumers clamoring for affordable solutions, yet their existing corporate culture and incentive systems are designed to support a "bigger is better" business model — not to deliver more with less. As the Age of Austerity dawns, however, corporate leaders will have no choice: they will have to bite the bullet and infuse their organizations with a frugal mindset. In sum, CEOs need a frugal innovation agenda.
Frugal innovation is the ability to innovate cost-effectively and sustainably under severe resource constraints. In our last blog post, we showed how Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Renault-Nissan and inventor of the concept of "frugal engineering", is reinventing his entire company so it can innovate faster, better, and cheaper in a complex and resource-scarce global environment.
Carlos Ghosn isn't the only CEO spearheading the frugal innovation revolution. In our book Jugaad Innovation, we profile leaders at companies such as GE, Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo, and Siemens who are also working on frugal ways to innovate and drive sustainable growth. These visionary CEOs aren't caving in to Wall Street's demands for short-term gains. Rather, they are boldly restructuring every function in their organizations to boost their firms' long-term ability to deliver affordable and sustainable solutions to increasingly cost-conscious and eco-aware consumers.
Based on our research, we suggest that CEOs eager to do more with less drive systemic changes across their entire organization — focusing their change management efforts on three functions: R&D, marketing, and sales. Specifically, CEOs must:
1.) Challenge R&D teams to create "good enough" solutions. CEOs should encourage R&D teams to move away from pursuing over-engineered "perfect products" — which today's thrifty customers find too expensive, hard to use, and eco-unfriendly — and focus instead on developing "good enough" solutions. By "good enough," we don't mean stripped-down versions of existing high-end products. Such quick-fix solutions could leave customers feeling less than satisfied, and designers would inevitably have to return to the drawing board down the road to undo the problems caused by such half-baked solutions. Rather, engineers of large firms need to create affordable solutions from the ground up — by heeding the advice of John Maeda, president of the Rhode Island School of Design, who notes: "R&D engineers must make frugal simplicity the core tenet of their design philosophy. They must design for the 'real world' by practicing...'radical incrementalism' — which is doing more with less."
Emerging markets like Africa, India and China offer Western engineers a great training ground to practice frugal simplicity. For example, Siemens, the German industrial giant, is using its R&D teams in India and China to develop minimalist solutions that deliver higher value to customers. In one instance, Siemens' engineers in India — working closely with their German colleagues — developed a Fetal Heart Monitor that uses inexpensive microphone technology rather than the costlier ultrasound technology. This "good enough" medical device promises to make quality healthcare affordable and accessible to more people — not only in emerging markets but also in developed economies.
2.) Create separate brands to sell the company's less expensive offerings. Given that they might already have well-established brands for higher-priced segments, to avoid brand dilution, marketing heads should develop distinctive new brands for their company's affordable segments. Doing so will reduce the problems of brand dilution while ensuring greater market coverage. For instance, many of Renault's affordable entry-level vehicles are sold under the brand Dacia, which includes the Logan, the highly successful sedan that sells for about $10,000, as well as an affordable van, pickup, and even SUV. Rather than marketing its Dacia products as "low-cost" vehicles, Renault is cleverly positioning them as vehicles that are stylish, comfortable, dependable, and affordable — i.e., they deliver more value at less cost.
Similarly, Siemens is grouping its affordable offerings — such as the microphone-tech-enabled Fetal Heart Monitor — under the label SMART, which stands for Simple, Maintenance-Friendly, Affordable, Reliable, and Timely-to-Market. In other words, Siemens is positioning its SMART products not only as being less expensive (they are 40-60% cheaper than high-end solutions) but also faster to deploy and easier to use and maintain for customers. Siemens's SMART product portfolio already boasts more than 160 affordable solutions ranging from X-ray machines to steam turbines to railway signaling systems.
3.) Create incentive systems for salespeople to sell frugal products. Western companies must recognize that frugal innovation isn't just about designing affordable products. It is also about successfully selling these frugal products in the marketplace. But successful selling won't happen as long as salespeople have the incentive to sell only big-ticket items. Instead, companies will have to align their salesforce's incentive systems with the corporate strategy of doing more with less. Companies can address this issue by reorganizing their salesforce along brand lines, with different salespeople responsible for the low-end and high-end segments. This will also help reduce any internal resistance based on the fear of cannibalization. Even better, as Renault-Nissan has successfully proven, healthy internal competition between divisions could drive sales and marketing personnel responsible for different brands to be more innovative in how they reach and keep their respective customers.
Consider that for decades, Procter & Gamble maintained a homogeneous sales structure, selling premium products to mainstream middle-class consumers. But as the purchasing power of middle-class Americans declines, P&G has restructured its sales force into two distinct groups that separately target high-income and low-income segments. This restructuring of the sales function bodes well for P&G, which is currently engaged in a "frugal innovation arms race" with its archrival Unilever. Indeed, Paul Polman, CEO of Unilever, has set a bold goal to double Unilever's revenue by 2020 while simultaneously curbing its environmental impact by 50%.
CEOs who are bold enough to implement this frugal innovation agenda — as leaders at P&G, Renault-Nissan, Siemens, and Unilever are doing — will be able to deliver significantly more value to customers while saving on costs and reducing environmental impact. According to the World Economic Forum, corporations can save a whopping $2 trillion by 2030 by implementing frugal innovation strategies that do a better job of utilizing resources.
In our upcoming blogs, we will share more case studies and proven techniques that can help you effectively design, make, and market frugal products and services.
Meanwhile, we are curious to hear from you: Is your organization, led by your CEO, driving a frugal innovation agenda? Are you involved with developing and commercializing affordable, good-enough solutions for customers feeling the squeeze of the recession? We want to hear about the challenges you have faced and the lessons you have learned so far in your frugal innovation journey.




Wednesday, May 30, 2012

What is disruptive innovation? Not Just Better!

Make it simple! Make it affordable! Make it accessible. Consider, not making it better, but differently in order to create, "Blockbuster" businesses.

 

_________________________________________________________________________ 

If you're not irate in the first 10 minutes of reading, if I don’t provoke you to revolutionize your management and leadership from think to execute, if you aren’t teetering on the brink of reaching for the Maalox, if you don’t innovate like a banshee, then I have failed you.   

To learn more about how Jim Woods and Innothink Group’s uncanny abilities can increase your competitive advantage and top line growth contact us for a consultation. 

Jim Woods CEO & President, InnoThink Group

A leading strategy, innovation and hypercompetition consultancy.

www.innothinkgroup.com

719-649-4118

 

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

How to Use Innovation Design to Drive Growth

Designers must deliver the orchestration of the total experience with a brand, product, or service or face irrelevancy



In a previous era, all the talk was of strategy, strategy, strategy. More recently, it's been innovation, innovation, innovation. As design thinking seems poised to sweep away some of today's celebrated innovation practices, we must be wondering what new provocation is on the horizon. Relax, I'm not planning to conjure one up.
For those of us on the design consulting side of the business, it has not exactly been a smooth ride lately. But then again, I can't say that I ever remember it being all that smooth, even when the demand for all forms of basic design and new production capability was sky-high.
Having lived one career on the corporate design side of the consumer-products industry and now a good part of another on the consulting side, I've seen the ascendancy of design as a profession and the movement of design toward business competency. At the outset, designers were about style and the creation of bright shiny objects, and we dutifully manned our post at the last decoration station on the way to the marketplace.
Today, there are arguably two design strategies in the marketplace. You either succeed as the low-cost producer, or you successfully differentiate your offering by design in a relevant, meaningful way that is valued by shoppers, consumers, and sellers. As such, the theoretical role of design in business is relatively uncomplicated and straightforward.

Design in Business

The complications come with these two questions: Where does the core idea around a differentiated, relevant, valued offering come from? And what is its relationship to this thing we used to call design? You know—the bright shiny objects.
In our practice, we refer to the former as innovation strategy, and to the latter as design strategy. Somewhere in between resides the opportunity for brand strategy, and we hope to create a system in which there is a seamless flow from ideas to brand meaning and, finally, to how that brand or product or service is expressed and communicated.
Putting all three aspects of this brand-building practice together provides validity in thinking about design as one of the primary idea generators for the creation of viable business platforms. Assuming that the manifestation of a business offering is realized in the context of a brand, that brand requires meaning, a defined expression, and then, given some success, a plan for continued opportunity development that sustains and grows the business.

How to Innovate

True innovation requires the adoption of a belief system that sometimes must prevail in the face of other data metrics. Read up on the great inventions and business wins and you will note that at the core of most of them lie belief, dedication, and the passion to succeed. Today's business leaders are often too afraid to move ideas forward without ironclad data proofs that they will be successful. All too often, they are the losers. Use your head, listen to your heart, and feel what's in your gut.
As long as the human spirit and the marketplace lives on, I'm sure we will be inventing and innovating. Innovation is the commercial side of discovery and invention. Change is a huge driver of both discovery and invention. The world changes around us and we discover new things and we observe change and invent new things to deal with change.
If designers are content to function as purveyors of bright shiny objects, they will likely fade into obscurity. On the other hand, if they step forward and deliver the orchestration of the total experience with a brand, product, or service in the context of our changing environment, their future, too, looks bright. via businessweek.com
Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. Jim is board president of a charter school located in Colorado Springs whose sole purpose is to prepare otherwise disadvantaged students more competitively for college. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective hypercompetition strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability. Subscribe to our innovation and hypercompetition newsletter.   
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Linkedin
Follow us on Facebook

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Find A Need and Fill it: How Apple becomes the first $1 trillion company

Its market cap today is $577 billion. Where do the next $400-plus billion come from? 

Click to enlarge.

In a note to clients issued early Tuesday, Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster raised his Q2 iPhone estimate (to 33 million), set a new 12-month price target ($910 per share) and -- most provocatively -- laid out a roadmap for Apple's (AAPL) market capitalization to go from $576.79 billion as of Monday's close to $1 trillion by 2014.

That would be a first. The previous record for the largest market cap (price per share times number of shares) ever reached by a public company was $619 billion, set by Microsoft (MSFT) in 1999.

So where does Apple get the next $400-plus billion?

The short answer: Half from more money pouring into tech stocks and half from money continuing to drain from the market cap of Apple's major competitors, who have roughly $1 trillion between them.

As the chart above shows, in the past four years, Apple's market cap increased by more than $390 billion while that of six core competitors -- Research in Motion (RIMM), Nokia (NOK), Sony (SNE), Dell (DELL) Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Microsoft -- decreased by more than $400 billion.

Turning to the next three years (2012-2014), Munster writes:

First, we believe dollars invested in US technology companies will increase ~5% y/y on average for the next three years (CY12-CY14). By comparison, dollars invested in US tech companies were up 9% y/y in 2011. Therefore, the tech sector will add ~$390 billion in market cap through 2014. We assume Apple could capture half of this market cap (from 85% in the 4 years prior).

Second, the companies we consider to be the 10 most relevant competitors to Apple (Samsung, HTC, RIMM, NOK, SNE, DELL, HP, MSFT, INTC, GOOG) represent nearly $1 trillion in market cap today. We believe 20% of that value, or ~$200 billion could shift to Apple through 2014. Thus there is potential for Apple to repeat history and add another $400 billion to its market cap. At a $1,000 share price (roughly $1 trillion in market cap) Apple would represent 26% of the total US tech market cap from 17% today.

Ironically, Munster believes that the impact of Apple's dividend -- which for years was touted as the trigger for growth funds to finally start putting money into Apple -- will be relatively small:

If we assume that 25% of large cap tech income funds buy AAPL (which we estimate to be about $150 billion), that would add around $40 billion to Apple's market cap or 10% of the total market cap increase needed to get to a $1,000 share price. That said, we believe many income funds have already bought shares of AAPL, so the more likely impact is closer to a 5% benefit.