Showing posts with label Innothink Group Innovation consulting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Innothink Group Innovation consulting. Show all posts

Monday, June 18, 2012

Food Cart Design That Doesn’t Block Airplane Aisles

Media_httpcdnpsfkcomw_mdqdj

The Orbit Aircraft Food Delivery System by Heather Dunne is a space-saving solution that solves a common and annoying problem on airlines.

 Orbit is a concept system for delivering food on commercial aircraft by UK designer Heather Dunne. The space-saving solution improves upon the traditional airline food cart by making it slimmer and longer, so passengers can get around flight attendants. The design also allows food to be easily loaded and unloaded and can hold more than the current cart.

A Food Cart That Doesn’t Block Airline Aisles

At 8 inches wide, Orbit is 4 inches thinner than traditional carts, which allows passengers to move past it in the aisle. It is able to hold up to 60 meals as it is longer than the current design, which holds around 35-40. Bio-pac food packages can be taken from the top using a pressure shelf system. Once one layer of packages is removed, the ones underneath move up, allowing flight attendants to deliver food to passengers without having to bend down. Orbit locks into sunken tracks in the aisles, with a motor that propels the wheels forwards or backwards. They can also be locked into the tracks during turbulence so it doesn’t lift off the floor.

A Food Cart That Doesn’t Block Airline Aisles

Orbit

 

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

This column will change your life: design thinking

 

This column will change your life: think like a designer
Oliver Burkeman: 'The notion that designers might have much to teach the rest of us has swept the business world.' Illustration: Francesco Bongiorni for the Guardian

If you're a graphic designer, you'll already know that "kerning" refers to making tiny adjustments to the spaces between letters. If you're not, there's a strong possibility you won't care. But either way I suspect you'll see why I was sceptical about a new book entitled Life Kerning: Creative Ways To Fine Tune Your Perspective On Career & Life, which treats kerning as a metaphor for living. No offence to the designers I've known, but they tend to be neat-freaks with an obsessive attention to detail (and stylish spectacles). These are excellent attributes for the job, but are they really a recipe for happiness? Most of us could do with a bit less perfectionism and a bit more acceptance of those parts of life that, metaphorically speaking, will always be in badly-kerned Comic Sans.

So I was pleasantly surprised to find that the book, by the Chicagoan designer Justin Ahrens, is a solid collection of antiperfectionistic advice – a font of wisdom, even. Ahrens doesn't overstretch his metaphor. He uses it to argue for "creating space" around the elements of your life by, say, planning short retreats to gain perspective, and to emphasise that small changes – a tiny tweak to a routine – might make all the difference between an awkward life and a beautiful one. "We tend to think sweeping changes need to be made," he writes, yet "it's often the fine adjustments between the smaller details… that tend to make the headlines of our lives seem… not as harmonious as they could be".

The notion that designers might have much to teach the rest of us has swept the business world. "Design thinking", to paraphrase its leading proponent, Roger Martin, means thinking that focuses on creating better things, while "analytical thinking", which is standard in business, is choosing between things. Sometimes, design thinking literally means what we colloquially mean by "design": the careers blogger Penelope Trunk argued recently that the past 20 years, dominated by email, favoured good writers, while new technologies mean "you will be more valuable and more relevant if you can think in terms of visuals". More broadly, design thinking refers to seeing things as systems, and shifting perspective to break out of predetermined grooves.

There's legitimate eyeball rolling to be done here. "The idea," writes one sceptical designer, Peter Merholz, "is that the left-brained, MBA-trained, spreadsheet-driven crowd has squeezed all the value they can out of their methods. To fix things, all you need to do is apply some right-brained, turtleneck-wearing creatives, 'ideating' tons of concepts and creating new opportunities for value out of whole cloth." Besides, creatives can be narrow-minded, too: studies on "architectural myopia" have shown architects literally see the world differently from laypeople, which may explain why they so often design buildings people hate using.

Still, there's something appealing about treating life as a design project: it's less cringe-inducing than "life as a work of art", yet more free-spirited than life as a to-do list. Most lives are too messy to think in terms of a blank canvas. But thinking in terms of elegantly arranging interlocking items is practical, while leaving space for real creativity. There's an old joke about designers, which I'd always taken as teasing them for being truculent, but perhaps on reflection it's more flattering: how many designers does it take to change a lightbulb? "Why does it have to be a lightbulb?"

oliver.burkeman@guardian.co.uk; twitter.com/oliverburkeman

• This column was corrected on 6 December 2011. In the original, Justin Ahrens was referred to as Jason Ahrens.

Searching For New Solutions to Attract and Retain More Customers? Looking for a Strategic and Innovation Advisor to work on retainer? A riveting speaker?

Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group; a leading Strategic Management and Innovation Consulting Firm in Denver, Colorado. He is an author, speaker, and a strategic innovation and hypercompetition expert to profit, non-profit organizations and municipalities. He advises clients with an objective view of their competitive capabilities and defines a clear course of action to maximize their innovation return on investment to achieve profitable growth. Build a capability for ongoing competitive innovation across your company. Call 719-649-4118 or complete our form: contact us for more information on hiring Jim to advise or speak for your next event.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Drucker: Innovation Nation—Or Stagnation?

Nothing’s new in the kitchen. All the appliances, apart from the SaladShooter, were invented decades ago. The automobile isn’t much changed since the Model T.  All we’ve been doing is adding new ornaments to old innovations, and the days when technology gave rise to millions of new jobs are long gone.

That, at least, is the argument of economist Tyler Cowen in his new book, The Great Stagnation. A “PBS NewsHour” segment this week explored Cowen’s argument and posed a provocative question: “Why hasn’t recent technology created more jobs?”

Cowen’s answer is simple: We’re inventing new things, but not enough of them. We’ve picked the low-hanging fruit.  “The rate of progress has slowed down,” he said. “And this is our central economic problem today.”

But Erik Brynjolfsson, who runs MIT’s Center for Digital Business, sees plenty of innovation in the United States. “Tyler Cowen and a lot of the people who are focused on the great stagnation, I think, are sort of backward-looking at the mature technologies that are at the peak of their S-curve, rather than the new technologies that are just emerging,” he told the NewsHour. In other words, inventions abound, but they’re just getting off the ground.

Image source: dreamstime.com

Peter Drucker—though he well understood the notion of the S-curve of technologies, a notion first analyzed by Russian economist Nikolai Kondratieff in the early 20th century—would have probably had an altogether different take on the matter. “The high-tech industries . . . have so far not been able to generate more jobs than the old industries have been losing,” Drucker wrote in his 1985 classic, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. “All projections indicate that they will not do much more for long years to come, at least for the rest of the century.” via thedx.druckerinstitute.com

Want to out compete your competitors? Want to bring new products and services to market faster? Want to be more agile? Need a compelling speaker? Hire Innovation and Growth Speaker Jim Woods. Jim works confidentially with start ups, governments as well as profit and for profit enterprises.

Visit our website:www.innothinkgroup.com Executive and Business Coaching: http://ow.ly/anBpK

Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective growth strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability.james@innothinkgroup.com

Follow us on Twitter: http://ow.ly/anyCg

Follow us on LinkedIn: http://ow.ly/anyJu

Fan us on Facebook: http://ow.ly/anyQ7

The Way To Innovate To Beat Radical Discontinuity


In the early 19th century most people lit their homes with lamps that burned whale oil. In mid-century a Canadian physician and geologist named Abraham Gesner developed kerosene, a cleaner-burning alternative made from a newly plentiful resource, crude oil, and founded what became the modern petroleum industry. Whaling, which had been a major world industry, ceased. Then Thomas Edison threw a light switch, and the world changed again. No one wanted the foul smell and dangerous flame of kerosene lanterns in their homes when they could have clean and easy electric light. Demand for fossil fuels plummeted, and they rose again only when Henry Ford came along and made the new technology of automobiles affordable for the masses. Today the ramifications of global warming threaten the automobile, electric power and oil industries.

The history of business is full of such stories, and they can strike fear into anyone who innovates to try to keep up with, or ahead of, markets. The idea that unpredictable, revolutionary forces that lie outside those markets can sweep away entire industries is terrifying. Even within an industry an agile disrupter can come along and overturn everything for those who were there before. And then there are those larger non-technological discontinuities such as the 9/11 attacks or the global financial crisis of 2008.

How can a business meet such unexpected threats? In my forthcoming book, Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal, to be published by Harvard Business Press in February, I talk about how businesses can innovate their existing business models in response to radically changing conditions or develop new units with different business models entirely.

The key to innovating your business model in the face of discontinuity is to look for the opportunities in the threat itself. You have to try to understand how the new circumstances will change the jobs customers need to get done or give rise to entirely new jobs they need to do. Understanding powerful external forces in this way can make the suddenly overwhelming far more manageable. Instead of hunkering down and waiting out the storm or freezing your current business model like a deer in headlights, you can transform and renew your company by building better models that take advantage of the shifting environment.

No one I know of is working more creatively to turn a threat into an opportunity than Better Place, the electric car company founded by Shai Agassi, a former SAP ( SAP - news - people ) executive turned green-tech entrepreneur. What could seem less promising than going head-to-head with an entrenched worldwide oil infrastructure using an immature alternative technology targeted at an ambivalent customer base? Yet what challenge could be more important than the shift from gasoline-based transportation to reliance on renewable energy through the wholesale adoption of electric cars?

As big as the challenge is, the tools Agassi is using to meet it are really no different from the ones any company should use to meet the challenge of disruptive change. Perhaps most important, Agassi began as all entrepreneurs and all companies embarking on business model innovation should. He systematically and carefully examined what jobs consumers were getting done when they bought a car. On one level, this was so blindingly self-evident that all the existing automakers might forgivably think they already knew it all. Not surprisingly, for instance, he determined that cars do the job of making people both independent and flexible. To do so, cars have to be affordable to buy, own and operate.

As any automaker or buyer will tell you, there's almost always a strong emotional element in owning a car, too. People want their automobiles to be fun to drive and pleasing, if not downright cool, to be seen in. Perhaps no less obvious, Agassi found that people pay more attention to the cost of buying and maintaining a car than of fuel. Digging a bit deeper, he confirmed what U.S. automakers have long contended, that people are usually not willing to sacrifice passenger capacity for economy. Most cars need to be big enough to carry five people comfortably long distances no matter how infrequently they'll be called on to do so.

Gathering all that insight, he was able to clearly identify his challenge: to make electric cars even more convenient and affordable than the already effective gas-powered alternative, even though they'd have to rely on batteries that can't yet remotely match the range of a gasoline engine. What's more, to truly make the world a better place, he'd needed to make a vehicle that could compete not only with the 50 million new cars sold every year but also with the 700 million used ones that consume the lion's share of fuel.

Bold challenges require bold solutions, and by concentrating on the jobs that cars do rather than on the cars themselves, Agassi came up with one: He would focus on selling not cars themselves but the underlying job, moving people over miles. He would replace oil-fueled miles with electricity-fueled miles in something like the way telecom companies sell cellphones. Two economic facts on his side: Electricity is cheaper than oil, mile per mile, particularly if drawn out of an innovatively managed grid, and government tax policies can help bring down the initial costs of electric cars before economies of scale can be achieved.

Refining this thinking further led Agassi to design the systems-level experiment he is currently running in Israel. Better Place is building a complete alternative clean-tech infrastructure there, a massive network of charging spots to hook up the electric grid to the parking infrastructure. To extend a car's range, its battery will no longer be an installed part of the automobile but will instead be part of the energy infrastructure. You'll be able to charge your battery at a charging station or, on a longer trip, simply swap it out for another one, in a process as quick and easy as filling the tank with gas is now. 

So far Agassi has raised at least $400 million from VantagePoint Venture Partners, Israel Corporation (which holds 33% ownership) and other investors and has a partnership with Renault ( RNSDY.PK - news - people )-Nissan ( NSANY - news - people ), which is building the car. He expects to have nearly 100,000 vehicles on the road in Israel by the end of 2011, and his vision is expanding. He has added new investors and partnerships in Denmark, Japan, Australia, Canada, Hawaii and San Francisco.

There is more to his business model, but the bottom line is that Better Place is an important experiment to watch regardless of its outcome. This kind of business model innovation--fearlessly focusing on the customer's jobs-to-be-done in the face of revolutionary change, and crafting a customer value proposition that can make money in entirely new ways--is exactly what it takes to find the opportunity in discontinuity.

Mark W. Johnson is chairman and co-founder of Innosight, an innovation consulting and research firm. He is the author of Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Transformative Growth and Renewal, to be published in February 2010 by Harvard Business Press, and is a co-author of The Innovator's Guide to Growth. via forbes.com

Want to increase growth and avoid commoditization? Want to out compete your competitors? Want to bring new products and services to market faster? Want to be more agile? Need a compelling speaker? Hire Innovation and Growth Speaker Jim Woods. Jim works confidentially with start ups, governments as well as profit and for profit enterprises.

Visit our website:www.innothinkgroup.com Executive and Business Coaching: http://ow.ly/anBpK

Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective growth strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability.james@innothinkgroup.com

Follow us on Twitter: http://ow.ly/anyCg

Follow us on LinkedIn: http://ow.ly/anyJu

Fan us on Facebook: http://ow.ly/anyQ7

Saturday, April 7, 2012

How to Identify New Business Models #Innovation #Strategy

By Joseph V. Sinfield, Edward Calder, Bernard McConnell and Steve Colson 
Organizations traditionally pursue growth via one or more of three broad paths:
  • They invest heavily in product development so they can produce new and better offerings.
  • They develop deep consumer insights in order to offer new and better ways to satisfy customers' needs.
  • They concentrate on strategy formulation to grow by acquisition or by moving into new or adjacent markets. 
Each of these paths usually involves devoting considerable time and resources to developing a corresponding organizational competency. For example, to build product capability, companies typically invest in in-house research and development departments and/or technology-sourcing expertise. Establishing customer insight capability often requires creating in-house market research units and implementing robust feedback links between the sales force and the developers of product or service lines. And creating a strategy capability generally involves setting up dedicated corporate strategy units and merger and acquisition groups or engaging consultants.
Recently, a fourth path has emerged, one that we might label "business model experimentation": the pursuit of growth through the methodical examination of alternative business models. At its heart, business model experimentation is a means to explore alternative value creation approaches quickly, inexpensively and, to the extent possible, through "thought experiments." The process sheds new light on potential competitors and lowers the risk of taking the wrong or a lesser-potential road — all for an initial investment that is typically quite small relative to what can be gained Research conducted in the last 10 years has established a link between business model innovation and value creation.1 To our minds, this research points to the need for organizations to build a competency in business model innovation — that is, in the process of exploring possible business.
Article available for purchase at MIT Sloan Management Review
Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. Jim is board president of a charter school located in Colorado Springs whose sole purpose is to prepare otherwise disadvantaged students more competitively for college. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective hypercompetition strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability. Subscribe to our innovation and hypercompetition newsletter.   
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Linkedin
Follow us on Facebook

Why You Never See Good Ideas: How Iteration-itis Kills Good Ideas #Innovation

"We never see any good ideas," lamented a senior executive. "People bring us ideas. But they just don't have any . . . magic."
At first, I found the comment surprising. I had just begun to get to know the company, and it seemed to me to be brimming with innovation energy, particularly among young employees who would regularly throw out creative "What if's" during casual conversations.
A month later, it was clear that the problem — as is almost always the case — wasn't a lack of raw ideas. Instead, there was a problem with the process that an idea generator had to go through before they stood in front of senior leadership. The company, it turned out, had a deep case of iteration-itis.
You see, before anything made it onto the agenda of the top management's biweekly meeting, it was vetted. And screened. And debated. And re-jiggered. The idea generator had to show the idea to their line manager. To key functional representatives. To key staff members of senior leaders. Maybe even to one or two members of leadership. Every person who saw the idea would express a clear point of view, and the poor idea generator had to figure out how to integrate seemingly contradictory feedback.
By the time idea generators had gone through this gauntlet of gate-keepers, their ideas became watered down and wafer thin — acceptable to everyone, exciting to no one.
How can you tell whether your company suffers from iteration-itis? Here's one simple test. Have someone working on an idea note in the file name of their PowerPoint slides or equivalent the number of meetings they have had to discuss and refine the idea ("Cool Disruptive Idea V6"). Consider even putting a visual of an iconic Hollywood clapboard on the first slide to bring this to life. If that numbers creeps above 15, it is a warning sign. Once you cross 30, watch out.
That's not to say that idea generators shouldn't get feedback. They should. But too much feedback transforms formerly interesting ideas into well-documented bowls of mush.
Here's how you can treat a case of iteration-itis. One simple technique is to organize low resolution ways to expose leaders to rough ideas. It's not surprising that leaders have high expectations for formal presentations. But imagine instead a high school science fair where people with ideas have a poster board that explains what they are thinking. Leadership can wander the room and stop to discuss ideas that catch their attention.
Another approach is to document different criteria for early-stage ideas. Leadership can clearly communicate what a good rough idea looks like, stopping well-intentioned gate-keepers from iterating away an idea's most interesting parts.
Think about involving new voices in the screening process. Early stage venture capitalists or angel investors, for example, are used to reacting to raw ideas. They ask tough questions for sure, but they also have the ability to see and bring out hidden beauty. It's an intuition the good ones have learned from years of practice.
Finally, switch innovation from academic to active by encouraging idea generators to test their critical assumptions early. In other words, instead of having idea generators get the opinions of dozens of gate-keepers, have them generate data from active experimentation. (I'll have more to say about this in a future post.)
I have yet to meet a corporation that isn't swimming in great ideas. If you are a leader and you aren't seeing them, starting looking for signs of a bad case of iteration-itis. via blogs.hbr.org
Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. Jim is board president of a charter school located in Colorado Springs whose sole purpose is to prepare otherwise disadvantaged students more competitively for college. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective hypercompetition strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability. Subscribe to our innovation and hypercompetition newsletter.   
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Linkedin
Follow us on Facebook

Three Ways to Transform the US Government (And Your Business) #Innovation

In December, Innosight and Forbes administered a survey to get a field-based perspective on transformation. We're still crunching through the results, (but,) there was one emerging finding that seemed worth highlighting.
The survey had an open-ended question, "What organization do you think is best positioned to transform itself over the next 3-5 years?" The almost 500 survey respondents flagged close to 75 different organizations. The most named organization? Google. The second-most named organization? The U.S. Government.
I think the survey responses are another indication of the general hope around the Obama administration, hope that of course will dissipate if it isn't translated into action.
Organizational transformation is a tough task. Just about everyone has lived through a failed effort to transform a team, unit, or broader organization. Done well, however, a transformation can set an organization up for decades of success. Look at what has happened to Apple during this decade or IBM in the 1990s.
There are three lessons from corporate transformation efforts that could help the new government achieve its aims:
  1. Transformation doesn't come from doing what you are currently doing better. It isn't just about doing what you are doing differently. It involves stopping some things, and starting others. Over the past two decade Procter & Gamble has exited many food-related businesses, stepped up investment in health and beauty businesses, and changed its overall approach to innovation.
  2. Start small. Asking everyone to do things differently is a sure recipe for failure, because you don't know what you don't know. Get some early wins before expanding efforts.
  3. Invest in the human side of transformation. It's hard to ask people to do what they are not capable of doing, or what they don't understand. Invest to build capabilities, bring in fresh mindsets, and develop a common language of change.
Succeeding with transformation is tough, but possible. And it is increasingly necessary; the "new normal" of constant change requires every organization to improve its ability to master transformation. Here's hoping that the glimmer of hope that appeared in our survey is realized. via blogs.hbr.org
Jim Woods is president and founder of InnoThink Group. A global management consulting firms specialized solely in helping organizations of all sizes in all industries catalyzing top line growth through strategic innovation and hypercompetition. Jim has over 25 years consulting experience in working with small, mid size and Fortune 1000 companies. He is a former U.S. Navy Seabee and grandfather of five. Jim is board president of a charter school located in Colorado Springs whose sole purpose is to prepare otherwise disadvantaged students more competitively for college. To arrange for Jim to speak at your next event or devise an effective hypercompetition strategy email or call us at 719-649-4118 for availability. Subscribe to our innovation and hypercompetition newsletter.   
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Linkedin
Follow us on Facebook